Multi-Cycle PlanningOpen the calculator

Portfolio Volatility Calculator

A portfolio volatility calculator shows how much a mix of investments swings from year to year, and why a mix usually swings less than its pieces suggest. Ours works on five broad kinds of investments under stated long-term assumptions. It is an illustration, not a forecast, and it never looks at any particular fund or account.

Open the portfolio volatility calculator

What it does

Volatility is the size of an investment's typical ups and downs, not which direction it goes. The calculator takes a mix of stocks, bonds, commodities, alternatives, and cash and shows the mix's assumed average year, how big its swings are, the range a typical year lands in, how often a year ends down in this model, and what the swings cost in compounded growth. Because different investments don't all move together, the mix's swings are usually smaller than the weighted average of its pieces. That gap is the diversification benefit.

How to use ours

  1. Build a mix with the five sliders, or start from an example. The mix needs to total 100%. The examples are illustrations, not recommendations.
  2. Read the results: the assumed average year, the size of the swings, a typical year's range, the odds of a down year in this model, and what the mix compounds to.
  3. Optionally enter a hypothetical portfolio value to see one year of those swings in dollars. Any amount, real or made up. Nothing you enter is stored.

The assumptions

Every figure is arithmetic over five rows: an assumed average year and a volatility for each kind of investment, plus how each pair moves together. They are the same long-term planning assumptions behind the full planning platform: assumptions, not forecasts, before inflation, fees, and taxes.

Kind of investmentAssumed average yearVolatility
Stocks7.25%16.5%
Bonds4.75%4.8%
Commodities3.90%18.3%
Alternatives5.70%7.0%
Cash3.00%0.7%

A worked example

The calculator opens on a mix of 60% stocks and 40% bonds. Under the assumptions above:

Side by side with all stocks, under the same assumptions:

MixAssumed average yearSwingsCompounds toDown years, in this model
60% stocks, 40% bonds6.25%±10.6%5.7%29%
All stocks7.25%±16.5%6.0%35%

All stocks has the higher assumed average year, and also bigger swings, more down years, and a bigger gap between its average and what it compounds to (1.3 points against 0.6). Neither is better in the abstract. The calculator shows these same figures for these mixes, computed by the same code.

What it leaves out

Related